PALOMAR GRADING PAVING INC v. [And eight other cases ...

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1680700.html
site-preview

Palomar Grading's is direct. It simply isn't “fair,” says Palomar Grading, to charge 10 percent against the “improver of land” – by which it appears Palomar Grading  ... Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select PALOMAR GRADING PAVING INC V. [AND EIGHT OTHER CASES.**] PALOMAR GRADING PAVING INC v. [And eight other cases.**] Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division 3, California. PALOMAR GRADING & PAVING, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants and Appellants. [And eight other cases.**] California Appellate Law Group, William N. Hancock, Ben Feuer; Fidelity National Law Group and James A. Moss for Defendant and Appellant Wells Fargo Bank. Manning & Kass, Ellrod, Ramirez, Trester, Darin L. Wessel and John D. Marino for Defendant and Appellant Kohl's Department Stores. Stuart D. Hirsch for Plaintiff and Respondent Palomar Grading & Paving. Wheatley, Scott & Company and Raymond D. Scott for Plaintiff and Respondent R3 Contractors. Law Offices of Gregory J. Hout and Gregory J. Hout for Plaintiff and Respondent Cass Construction. The Great Recession hit Southern California's Inland Empire region—roughly defined as Riverside and San Bernardino counties—particularly hard.   This is one of a number of cases which have, in the aftermath of that recession, finally made their way to this court.   The appeal stems from financial difficulties encountered in the construction of a Kohl's department store in Beaumont.   The developer of the store was Inland–LCG Beaumont, LLC (Inland) a Utah firm and the general contractor a Texas firm, 361 Group Construction Services, Inc. (361).  Somewhere in the process of construction the money dried up and 361 refused to pay its subcontractors for work they had done.   Those subcontractors included Cass Construction (Cass), TNT Grading Inc. (TNT), Palomar Grading & Paving (Palomar Grading) and R3 Contractors (R3).



Palomar Grading & Paving Inc | Better Business Bureau® Profile

https://www.bbb.org/us/.../palomar-grading-paving-inc-1126-171998840
site-preview

This organization is not BBB accredited. General Engineering Contractor in Escondido, CA. See BBB rating, reviews, complaints, & more.---



Palomar Grading & Paving Inc 135 W Mission Ave Ste 207 ...

https://www.yellowpages.com/.../palomar-grading-and-paving-460390488
site-preview

Get reviews, hours, directions, coupons and more for Palomar Grading & Paving Inc. Search for other Paving Contractors on The Real Yellow Pages®. HomeCAEscondidoBuilding ContractorsPaving ContractorsPalomar Grading & Paving Inc Palomar Grading & Paving Inc Paving Contractors, General Contractors, Grading Contractors Is this your business? Customize this page.Claim this business HoursDo you know the hours for this business?Extra Phones NeighborhoodCentral EscondidoAKA CategoriesPaving Contractors, General Contractors, Grading Contractors 5First-class4Better than most3About what I expected2Not the worst...1Disappointing MORE PAVING CONTRACTORS IN THE AREA 1905 Commercial St, Escondido, CA 92029 989 Postal Way, Vista, CA 92083 2116 Bluebird St, San Diego, CA 92114 2142 Industrial Ct Ste D, Vista, CA 525 W El Norte Pkwy, Escondido, CA 520 N Quince St Ste 10, Escondido, CA PLACES NEAR ESCONDIDO WITH PAVING CONTRACTORS Legal | Terms of Service and Use Like us on FacebookFollow us on Twitter Privacy Policy|Do Not Sell My Personal Information © 2021 Thryv, Inc. All rights reserved. YP, the YP logo and all other YP marks contained herein are trademarks of YP LLC and/or YP affiliated companies. All other marks contained herein are the property of their respective owners.



Palomar Grading & Paving, Inc.

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/...B.../GAOREPORTS-B-274885.htm
site-preview

DECISION Palomar Grading & Paving, Inc. protests the award of a contract to Weststar, Inc. under invitation for bids (IFB) No. N68711-96-B-5048, issued by the  ... TITLE: Palomar Grading & Paving, Inc. ********************************************************************** Matter of:Palomar Grading & Paving, Inc. William L. Bruckner, Esq., Bruckner & Walker, for the protester. Clinton D. Hubbard, Esq., for Weststar, Inc., an intervenor. Christopher M. Bellomy, Department of the Navy, for the agency. David A. Ashen, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. Protest that agency improperly considered awardee's late hand-carried bid for award is denied where awardee's reasonable reliance on the incorrect address specified in the solicitation for the delivery of bids was the paramount cause of late receipt, and the awardee submitted its bid to United Parcel Service (UPS) before bid opening and it does not appear that the awardee handled or otherwise had control over its bid after it was surrendered to UPS and before it was delivered to the agency on the day after bid opening. Palomar Grading & Paving, Inc. protests the award of a contract to Weststar, Inc. under invitation for bids (IFB) No. N68711-96-B-5048, issued by the Department of the Navy for repair of the runway and taxiway at the Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS), Yuma, Arizona. Palomar argues that the Navy was required to reject Weststar's bid as The IFB's cover page (Standard Form 1442) stated that bids were due at the place specified in Item 8 by 2 p.m. on August 16, 1996. Item 8 indicated that bids were to be addressed to the issuing authority








Ads